A reverse mortgage operates completely differently from a normal mortgage. A person with equity in their home trades their equity for the right to live in the home for as long as they are living and the ability to cash out the equity over time similar to a Home Equity Line of Credit. Since the person, who must be over the age of 62 and from my understanding not own the home with anyone below that age, can cash out the equity there is a possibility that equity can be used to pay off outstanding mortgages and liens. The amount of money a person can receive in a reverse mortgage depends on their age (the older you are the higher percentage of equity you can take out) and the value of the home. Therefore, in certain situations a Reverse Mortgage is a viable alternative to foreclosure. The following are two examples. The first is where a Reverse Mortgage is a viable option. The second is where it is not.
Example Where It Works: Person A owns a $800,000 home with a $200,000 mortgage with Bank B. Person A receives an equity line in a reverse mortgage from Bank C for $300,000 (half the remaining equity). Person A takes out $200,000 from that equity line with Bank C and pays off the mortgage with Bank B. Person A now has a $300,000 reverse mortgage on the property with Bank C but no mortgage with Bank C.
Example Where It Doesn't Work: Person A owns a $500,000 home with a $550,000 mortgage with Bank B. The property lost a lot of value when the market fell apart and was once worth nearly a million dollars. Bank C won't give Person A a reverse mortgage because there is no equity in the home.
Reverse Mortgages are a complicated topic. If you are looking into applying for one you should see someone who has experience handling their application process.
